Marriage Quotas

I just read an article on World Net Daily (wnd.com) entitled California bans 'brides,' 'grooms.' It seems a marriage license in Placer County, California was rejected for having used the audacious, bigoted, and insensitive terms, inflaming the gods of political correctness.

What's next? Homosexual marriage quotas? Or maybe forced homosexuality, as in the perverted "tests" that grew out of the warped mind of Adolf Hitler?

Shortly before I departed the once-great Golden State in 2001, I voted in the 2000 election for, among other things, the famed Proposition 22. Prop 22 clearly defined marriage as between a man and a woman. Duh. And yes, it passed overwhelmingly. But leave it to the geniuses, those all-knowing souls at the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals, to water down the wording and circumvent the proposition's core meaning, thus negating its validity and allowing homosexual marriages to be recognized. Not by me, ever, in any way, shape, or form -- but by the powers that be.

Stop the world, I want to jump off. (Actually, please speed it up to several hundred times its current rotational rate so I'll just fly off without having to exert any effort.)